<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for California High Speed Rail Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cahsrblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com</link>
	<description>California High Speed Rail support blog, spreading news and info about the high speed trains project approved by California voters in November 2008.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:52:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Buena Park&#8217;s HSR Concerns by Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/buena-parks-hsr-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-71990</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2933#comment-71990</guid>
		<description>The easiest way to kill the tunnel is kill the dedicated HSR tracks. Build two tracks with passing sidings at Norwalk. That way you could even do something radical like send HSR directly to Santa Ana and Irvine in Phase I. I don&#039;t get why it&#039;s an axiom that Anaheim needs direct service but everyone else in the metro area needs to transfer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to kill the tunnel is kill the dedicated HSR tracks. Build two tracks with passing sidings at Norwalk. That way you could even do something radical like send HSR directly to Santa Ana and Irvine in Phase I. I don&#8217;t get why it&#8217;s an axiom that Anaheim needs direct service but everyone else in the metro area needs to transfer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HSR Planning Done Right by Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/hsr-planning-done-right/comment-page-1/#comment-71989</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2938#comment-71989</guid>
		<description>Diridon Intergalactic is planned to have 14 tracks where the expected train volume could do with 4. So there&#039;s no pressure at DIG to take off. It&#039;s not like at TBT or LAUS, where track constraints are real and passenger volumes are likely to be high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diridon Intergalactic is planned to have 14 tracks where the expected train volume could do with 4. So there&#8217;s no pressure at DIG to take off. It&#8217;s not like at TBT or LAUS, where track constraints are real and passenger volumes are likely to be high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Buena Park&#8217;s HSR Concerns by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/buena-parks-hsr-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-71988</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2933#comment-71988</guid>
		<description>&quot;there’s an argument for designing tracks shared with Metrolink, like the tracks planned to be shared by Caltrain and HSR in the Peninsula.&quot;

Well that&#039;s off the table in the South. Work on denying Anaheim homeowners their tunnel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there’s an argument for designing tracks shared with Metrolink, like the tracks planned to be shared by Caltrain and HSR in the Peninsula.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well that&#8217;s off the table in the South. Work on denying Anaheim homeowners their tunnel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Distributing the Other Prop 1A Rail Funds by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/distributing-the-other-prop-1a-rail-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-71987</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2936#comment-71987</guid>
		<description>Metrolink is slowly imploding on itself and is entering yet another round of service cuts and fare hikes. Before they even think about electrification they must install positive train control because they can&#039;t keep their pedophile Connex engineers from texting young railfan boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metrolink is slowly imploding on itself and is entering yet another round of service cuts and fare hikes. Before they even think about electrification they must install positive train control because they can&#8217;t keep their pedophile Connex engineers from texting young railfan boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HSR Planning Done Right by Spokker</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/hsr-planning-done-right/comment-page-1/#comment-71986</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2938#comment-71986</guid>
		<description>Hahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HSR Planning Done Right by John Burrows</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/hsr-planning-done-right/comment-page-1/#comment-71985</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2938#comment-71985</guid>
		<description>Worst case scenario-------The NIMBYS win!!!!   High speed trains have to run from Palo Alto to San Francisco at greatly reduced speed and much fewer in number.  In this worst of all cases a Mountain View station would take some of the pressure off Diridon.  Is this even a remote possibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst case scenario&#8212;&#8212;-The NIMBYS win!!!!   High speed trains have to run from Palo Alto to San Francisco at greatly reduced speed and much fewer in number.  In this worst of all cases a Mountain View station would take some of the pressure off Diridon.  Is this even a remote possibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Distributing the Other Prop 1A Rail Funds by Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/distributing-the-other-prop-1a-rail-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-71984</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2936#comment-71984</guid>
		<description>It does make sense, however, CalTrain is the only one with any real plans to do so (which, btw, have been in the works for years now).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does make sense, however, CalTrain is the only one with any real plans to do so (which, btw, have been in the works for years now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Distributing the Other Prop 1A Rail Funds by Thomas Noi</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/distributing-the-other-prop-1a-rail-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-71983</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Noi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2936#comment-71983</guid>
		<description>If Caltrain is considering electrifying its diesel railroad because of HSR, then Metrolink and other transit agencies should do so as well. It makes passenger trains more environmentally-clean and not dependent on fossil fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Caltrain is considering electrifying its diesel railroad because of HSR, then Metrolink and other transit agencies should do so as well. It makes passenger trains more environmentally-clean and not dependent on fossil fuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HSR Planning Done Right by Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/hsr-planning-done-right/comment-page-1/#comment-71982</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2938#comment-71982</guid>
		<description>Officially, it&#039;s not. But unofficially, all the sample timetables say RWC where they used to say RWC or PA. The message is, sue Diridon and Kopp and they&#039;ll kill your station stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Officially, it&#8217;s not. But unofficially, all the sample timetables say RWC where they used to say RWC or PA. The message is, sue Diridon and Kopp and they&#8217;ll kill your station stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HSR Planning Done Right by Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/03/hsr-planning-done-right/comment-page-1/#comment-71981</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cahsrblog.com/?p=2938#comment-71981</guid>
		<description>The location of the station will not be based on &quot;political trouble caused,&quot; but rather what location is most likely to attract the most ridership and serve the most people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The location of the station will not be based on &#8220;political trouble caused,&#8221; but rather what location is most likely to attract the most ridership and serve the most people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
