California HSR Gets $194 Million Federal Grant

Oct 2nd, 2010 | Posted by

The Federal Railroad Administration this week released $235 million in ARRA (i.e. the “stimulus”) funds for high speed rail planning, and California received $194 million – or 82.5% of the total – for engineering and planning work on our SF to Anaheim project. Here’s an excerpt from the press release the California High Speed Rail Authority sent out announcing the grant:

“This funding award demonstrates again the continued confidence the federal government has in California and the progress we’re making in planning our state’s high-speed rail project,” said Curt Pringle, Chairman of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. “This will give California’s system the funds we need to complete the environmental review and bring us closer to realizing the enormous opportunity this project represents for our state.”

It may not be construction funds, but nearly $200 million in money to help pave the way for HSR construction is a pretty big deal for the project, a strong vote of confidence from the federal government for California’s ongoing work to plan and ultimately build the HSR system.

At least one writer sees this as being very significant for California’s future:

It will not increase California’s gross state product over the next 12 months. Nor will it create 100,000 – or 10,000 or even as few as 1,000 – new jobs by this time next year.

Yet, of all the federal stimulus grants and awards California has received to date, none will contribute more to the state’s long-term economic growth than the $194 million it received yesterday to chug ahead with what state officials hope will be the nation’s first full blown high speed rail system….

California is the world’s eighth largest economy. It should have a world class transportation network, including a modern high speed rail system.

Perkins recounted the hundreds of thousands of jobs the project will create, the savings from reduced carbon emissions and reduced oil consumption, and the economic activity enabled by fast passenger rail service as the reasons why the HSR project is so important to our state’s economic recovery. And he is right, of course. It’s good to see someone in the state media make that point so strongly and clearly.

California cannot afford to delay or even refuse to build the HSR project. To do so would ensure a prolonged recession as the state shackles itself to its cars and to dependence on ever-rising oil prices. Just as the railroads brought a boom to California in the late 19th century, and just as the interstates and aqueducts brought prosperity in the second half of the 20th century, high speed rail will provide part of the base for 21st century prosperity.

Keep that in mind when those who are already prosperous try to argue against building this project. They believe they can and should undermine everyone else’s prosperity in order to protect their own – even though HSR will boost property values all along the proposed route and generate new jobs and economic activity that even a NIMBY will find economically beneficial.

  1. Brandon from San Diego
    Oct 2nd, 2010 at 12:01
    #1

    As I recall from previous news on similiar grant opportunities, the award could be used for construction too… whereas if planning/environmental review,final design had been completed…. left over funds could be used for construction or proerty aquisition.

    YesonHSR Reply:

    We really need is that 2010 grant money to be awared…2.3billion for HSR..

    Victor Reply:

    One step at a time, Planning first, Then HSR construction funding.

    Brandon from San Diego Reply:

    My point above was for the express purpose of countering any argument that $194 million is a lot of money for planning, environmental, and design work.

  2. StevieB
    Oct 2nd, 2010 at 16:32
    #2

    “If high-speed rail is going to happen in the US, it’s going to start here in California,” said Chairman Curt Pringle. “It is our responsibility to not be bogged down by lawsuits or other roadblocks, but to focus on the positive implications and possibilities of high-speed rail.”

    Victor Reply:

    What starts in California, Doesn’t always stay in California, As traditionally California leads the way.

    jimsf Reply:

    exactly why we should get ours done first. To maintain our leadership position, as we always do. ( oh yeh and to be able to say neener neener :-P to the eastern media/haters who are always claiming california is over… ;-)

    dave Reply:

    If people hate us, we must be doing good. Remember, the best is always hated by people who aren’t a part of it.

    jimsf Reply:

    aka living well is the best revenge. And let’s face, we live well in california.

    wu ming Reply:

    well, that depends on who you are these days, but certainly to be able to live well ought to be an unalienable part of the california dream. and fast-as-hell trains zipping everyday californians effortlessly around the state will be a big part of that.

    jimsf Reply:

    atherton tops the list

  3. Alonzo
    Oct 2nd, 2010 at 17:42
    #3

    What an outrageous waste of money for a project that will never be built, and certainly not before Curt Pringle gets fired or fined or jailed for having a blatant conflict of interest.

    Peter Reply:

    Jailed? Where in God’s name do you get that from?

    Victor Reply:

    Probably from His dreams.

    dave Reply:

    Never say Never!

    Peter Reply:

    Do YOU see any criminal sanctions in the statute?

    StevieB Reply:

    Most people have very little understanding of how the courts work. Have you watched any of the numerous television judge shows?

    Peter Reply:

    I do my best to stay away from them. I get annoyed enough already when people talk about the fictitious Winnebago case they read about on some email sent around the office.

    jimsf Reply:

    Alonzo, your kettle is whistling.

    YesonHSR Reply:

    Any more lame BS from reason/shallowAlto?

    Victor Reply:

    No wonder My Dad never applied for Newspaper job in Palo Alto, Way too shallow for Him back then.

  4. Emma
    Oct 6th, 2010 at 15:29
    #4

    Is that really federal money or just due to inflation?? 150 million from the feds is like filling your tank with $2. Peanuts!

  5. J. Wong
    Oct 6th, 2010 at 15:57
    #5

    This is _all_ that was requested for completion of the “CA-PHASE1HSRPROGRAM-PE/NEPA/CEQA”, i.e., all the EIR’s, which should specify what they plan to do (like aerial on the Pennisula) and where.

Comments are closed.